it is a pleasure to discuss this topic with you, the members of this thread. you really carry this discussion forward, all of us, but i feel emeline is thinking especially out of the box and is moderating exellently !
There might indeed be a need to make people feel fear, in order for them to become more willing to do what must be done in the future... the media is in fact obviously massively changing the willingness to take action, or to accept a downgrading of standards. , just to help the climate recover.
Emeline asked the following question: " Wouldn’t ALL the countries of the world be reacting/changing if they KNEW manmade actions WERE causing environmental cataclysm?" Brilliant ! this might be a possible motivation behind staged news reports.
the “man-made” climate change ! The mass-death-reports indeed do have the impact to make people act differently in the future, especially If another event comes round the corner and into the scene. people will be "prepared" -
even tough it remains hypothetical - this is the first concludent strategy someone might have had.
I really appreciate those toughts.
But actually, one question remains unanswered. Let us pretend many of the stories ARE staged. Then how on earth is it possible to fool journalists all around the world so fundamentally, that they all publish those articles without checking their sources for plausibility?
did all those articles really all leak through the press without sufficient cecks on authenticity and credibility of the statements they published? did not a single journalist ask questions about the missing details , or the desire to publish pictures of his/her own?
this question should probably bother us for another while, should it not?
conclusion A: in fact: all those reports about mass-deaths certainly have the potential to fundamentally change the behaviour of mankind in the future. be they staged or not.
B: how come no press-headquarter stumbled upon the lack of details and pictures within their reports? - has the professional press not learned to check sources ? has the professional press not learned to get hold of god pictures for the stories they publish?